Dec 4

Sexual Harrassment

Tags:

Notice of sexual harassment must be provided to the employer in order to bring a claim with rare exception.  The 10th Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether notice was provided in Debord v. Mercy Health System of Kansas. Sara Debord filed suit against Mercy Health Services of Kansas for sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII. Debord claimed Mercy knew or should have known that her supervisor created a hostile workplace through unwanted touching and offensive sexual remarks. She also claimed that Mercy did not do enough to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace, and that, when she finally reported the harassment five years after it allegedly began, Mercy retaliated by firing her. The district court granted summary judgment for Mercy and dismissed Debord’s suit.

Debord argued that Mercy was directly liable for the harassment because it had actual notice of the harassment based on a complaint about the supervisor touching her made by another employee in 2001. The Tenth Circuit held that “notice of one instance of potential harassment of someone else cannot, without more, constitute actual notice of Debord’s sexual harassment three years later.” Debord also failed to show actual notice because she did not provide any evidence showing the extent, seriousness, or similarity of the prior misconduct.

Debord also argued Mercy had constructive notice of the harassment before 2009 when she told human resources about the unwanted touching. The court found evidence provided by Debord on this issue was not so “egregious, numerous, and concentrated” as to create a jury question on constructive notice.
The court applied the elements of the Faragher defense in determining the hospital could not be held vicariously liable. Debord failed to report the harassment even though Mercy provided sexual harassment training, annual reminders, an open-door policy with the management team, and an anonymous hotline to report harassment. The court also found Debord failed to show pretext on her retaliation claim and affirmed summary judgment for Mercy.

Victims of illegal harassment should follow the employer’s policy on reporting harassment.  If you feel that you have a harassment claim, call Denver Employment Lawyer Gregory A. Hall to set up a consultation.

Gregory A. Hall
Denver Employment Lawyer
3570 E. 12 Avenue, Suite 200
Denver, CO 80206
Ph. 303-320-0584
Email: gregory@federallaw.com
Web: http://adenverlawyer.com

admin

Denver Lawyer Gregory A. Hall has represented injured persons since 1995 in the following areas: personal injury, employment, civil rights, wage and hour, insurance bad faith, OPM disability retirement, federal workers’ compensation, FLSA, FELA and business litigation.

No comments yet.

Leave a Comment

reset all fields